how exciting is it that the tudors is returning to tv this sunday?
a) heh.
b) woot woot!
c) wtf! fly me to a country that has showtime. NOW.
how exciting is it that the tudors is returning to tv this sunday?
a) heh.
b) woot woot!
c) wtf! fly me to a country that has showtime. NOW.
FOR YOUR KIND ATTENTION,
We are a Corporate Financial Service Provider in Europe. We had a customer who deposited some money with us and eventually died without any reference to a next of kin.
In accordance with the EU Trust and Federal Laws, at the expiration of 6 (six) years, his investments with our Financial Trust shall revert to ownership of the government of the country of the said investments if nobody applies as the next of kin to claim the investments.
Since you share the same surname with my client. I want to present you to stand in as the next of kin so that you and I can benefit from this investment equally. I guarantee that this will be executed under legitimate arrangement that will protect us from any breach of the law.
If this proposal is acceptable to you, kindly indicate your telephone, fax numbers and location where the money will be remitted.
I will instruct you on the next step to take.
With friendly greetings,
James Ransome
-found in my gmail inbox this morning
after seeing the invitation to self-tag on runltw, i’ve used the following rules
Once you’ve been tagged, you are supposed to write a note with 16 random things, facts, habits, or goals about you. At the end, choose 16 people to be tagged. You have to tag the person who tagged you. If I tagged you, it’s because I want to know more about you.
to put together the following:
1. i could have been named tara (suggested by a cousin) or taiyyba(h) (suggested by my father).
2. i have a cyst on the left side of my jaw that swells up and hurts when i get a cold. i’ve had it since i was a 3 or 4. i don’t know how i got it. when i was in high school, i asked my doctor if i could get elective surgery to get it removed. the plastic surgeon scared me away, saying that by going ahead with the surgery, i would likely end up with a scar and maybe lack of sensation in that part of my face.
3. the first time i spoke to my father on the phone, i thought he was stuck in an iron. i couldn’t speak much after the salaam and cried all the home. i was probably 4 or 5.
4. i’ve been mistaken for a 12-year-old at the age of 22. while that’s a ridiculous example, women in the waiting room of my family doctor’s office always ask me which grade i’m in, assuming that i’m a high schooler.
5. i’ll bet you anything the next time i stand at a bus shelter or station, an unfamiliar, elderly woman will initiate a conversation with me.
6. when i was an infant, i nearly fell into a boiling pot of kheer my mother was cooking and standing over. my mother somehow saved me, but fell in herself, burning half of her torso. she still has the scars.
7. i was seven when i saw my father in person for the very first time.
8. i’m a terribly shy person, but i always enjoy good one-on-one conversations. also, the people i end up being good friends are not people i meet in crowds, and it’s usually the first and completely random conversation that decides what kind of friendship i’ll have with a certain person. this isn’t a hard and fast rule, of course, but it’s a pattern i’ve noticed over the years.
9. i’m ridiculously dependent on desserts. no lunch or dinner of mine is compelete without them. i think i got the addiction from my mother.
10. i had my head shaved 14 times because my hair was so thin and my mother thought having me bald until the age of three would pay off. i guess it sort of, kind of did. she finally stopped after i refused to show myself in front of guests.
11. people in public places (ttc passengers, bank tellers, cashiers, mall shoppers) tell me i’m beautiful or have a “beautiful face.” having my mother beside me on half of these occasions makes it especially awkward for everyone involved. i wonder what she’s thinking. does she take it as a compliment (to her)? or as random flirtation?* it also doesn’t help that i generally don’t know how to receive compliments, but i’ve realised that a smilethanksalhamdulillah is sufficient.
*a greek man in the zellers line-up told me and my mother that i looked like i was from a region of greece where women cover their hair and folks have darker skin and sharp features. he went on to say that i looked like his wife…
12. whether it’s a practical issue or a thesis and argument for the term paper, i figure out difficult problems in the shower. while i like being in the shower, i don’t particularly like getting there. when i was younger, my family would shame me into taking baths/showers. now, i just shame myself.
13. for most of my life, i’ve been mortified of dogs, regardless of breed and size. on my way back from a great uncle’s house in my dad’s village in pakistan, i was chased by a stray dog. i was alone and three. up until a few years ago, i had the most irrational fear of dogs. if i saw one across the street, it was enough to set me off. my worst fears were confirmed when just a few years ago, a young cousin was chased by a stray dog in the same village. my grandmother came to the rescue, but the dog bit her and the doctors soon found out that the dog had rabies. (the grandmother is okay now.)
14. even though i’ve never personally run into serious medical problems, i have practically no faith in doctors. i’ve repeatedly been disappointed and dismissed by doctors of different fields and expertise to, so all my visits to doctors have become exercise in quiet satire.
15. i walk funny. when i walk, my feet barely touch the ground. my podiatrist showed me my footprints and it was the weirdest thing: for each foot, only the first three toes and barely a half of the ball touches the ground. this, apparently, is the main cause of my chronic back pain. (also, i think i’m kind of bow-legged.)
16. in parties and get-togethers, i sit still and move calmly, but i dance like an iffster (cf. elaine) when i’m alone.
at first, i didn’t think i could come up with 16 things. by the time i was done, i almost had too many.
okay, i tag: yaser, adnan, geetha, zarina, asmaa, aamir, (fathima)
as promised, promissory estoppel:
in canadian law, if, in the duration of an ongoing contract, party A, through its conduct or language, leads party B to believe that it won’t stick strictly to the terms of the original contract, then courts expect that the parties will stay truer to the informal agreement than the strict wording of the contract.
to illustrate:
reena, a landlord, makes a legal agreement on 15 january 2004 to rent space to bobby for the operation of a tea shop. the contract/lease is for five years and requires bobby to notify reena by 15 january 2008 for a further three-year lease extension.
bobby makes killer chai, and naturally, reena and bobby become friends. reena drops by the tea shop for free tea every morning before going off to work. on more than one occasion and in front of bobby’s customers, reena says to bobby, “girl, i don’t know how i’d start my day without you. i’m gonna keep you here forever.”
three years and ten months into the rental contract (i.e., november 2007), and on the success of her business, bobby talks to reena about a possible redesign for the tea shop. reena not only agrees that a redesign would be a great change, but proposes a renovation to both the exterior and the interior of the building. bobby says, “dude, that’s crazy. you know i can’t afford all that.”
reena thinks about the issue for a couple of days before offering bobby a $20, 000 loan. bobby is ecstatic and quickly begins making arrangements for the renovation. reena gives the money to bobby in december 2007. the construction company, a.b. construction, agrees to begin the project in march 2008 and complete it within a month.
a rich man named ronald frump moves into town in january 2008. he canvasses the city for its most valuable property and finds bobby’s tea shop to be of special interest because of its proximity to the transit system and local restaurants. frump contacts reena on 5 feburary 2008 and informs her that he is interested in buying the property and turning it into a night club. reena refuses the offer, but frump is persistent. on 15 feburary 2008, reena receives a letter from frump, titled “final offer,” with an offer unlike reena could ever imagine. so reena finds herself unable to reject the offer and agrees to sell the property to to frump on the 31 january 2009.
even though she is too embarrassed to meet bobby in person and inform her of the sale, reena sends a notice to bobby reminding her that she must vacate the property on or before 15 january 2009 upon the termination of the rental agreement because the property has been sold. bobby does not respond to the letter and the two women have minimal contact with each other in february 2008. in early march, reena resumes her visits to bobby’s tea shop. the two don’t bring up the sale of property, but are otherwise able to resume their friendship as it once was.
it’s 20 january 2009 and bobby’s still operating her tea shop on reena’s property.
reena sues bobby for breach of contract. the terms of the lease explicitly required bobby to notify reena for an extension. reena can argue that the notice of termination she sent to bobby was a significant piece of communication between the two women. in addition, in the absence of a renewal request made by bobby, reena can say that she assumed bobby would not be renewing the lease.
bobby can use the defense of promissory estoppel, however, and say that reena’s conduct and language had led her to believe that a formal notice for lease extension was unnecessary. specifically, the friendship between the two women, the loan transaction, and the conversations in the tea shop, amounted to the assumption that bobby would continue leasing the property after 15 january 2009 and reena would not evict her. furthermore, reena’s failure to bring up the sale of the property in conversations subsequent to the february 2008 notice of lease termination had led bobby to believe that the purchase hadn’t gone through.
if reena has a good lawyer, she’ll have the court agree to uphold the original contract, and decide that bobby breached the contract; if bobby’s got the better lawyer, she’ll be allowed to remain on the property on the basis of promissory estoppel and the lawsuit will be thrown out.
and that, folks, is promissory estoppel.
estop! it’s is not just a witty or even rockstar way of saying “stop.”
estoppel is a real legal concept in contract and property law, involving equitable remedies.
truth.
c: i’ve been good all day so far.
h: christmas is getting near, huh?
c: you got it.
c: i’ve been wondering, though. is it truly being good if the only reason i behave well is so i can get more loot at christmas?
c: i mean, really, all i’m doing is saying i can be bribed.
c: is that good enough, or do i have to be good in my heart?
c: in other words, do i really have to be good or do i just have to act good?
h: i suppose in your case, santa will have to take what he can get.
c: ok…so exactly how good do think i have to act? really good, or just pretty good?
-the indispensable calvin and hobbes: a calvin and hobbes treasure by bill watterson, p. 13. emphasis in the original.
*machiavelli, yes.
the object of love…is [to give] birth in beauty, whether in body or in soul.
[...] what love wants is not beauty, as you think it is.
well, what is it, then?
reproduction and birth in beauty.
mabye, i said.
certainly, she said. now, why reproduction? it’s because reproduction goes on forever; it is what mortals have in place of immortality.
[...]
now, some people are pregnant in body … while others are pregnant in soul – because there surely are those who are even more pregnant in their souls than in their bodies, and these are pregnant with what is fitting for a soul to bear and bring to birth. and what is fitting? wisdom and the rest of virtue, which all poets beget, as well as all the craftsmen who are said to be creative.”
-diotima and socrates on the mysteries of love. diotima is in black; socrates is in orange. plato’s symposium, 206b-209a, trans. alexander nehamas & paul woodruff